jessenoller.com

For some rea­son, I found myself read­ing the Duck Typ­ing entry in wikipedia (which is sort of like watch­ing a slow mov­ing train­wreck). Of more inter­est was the Talk page.

If you get a chance, I rec­om­mend you read both — and after your done laugh­ing, take a look at my pre­vi­ous arti­cles (rants?) on the sub­ject — typeducking-on-duck-vs-static-typing and schrodingers-type-is-a-namespace-a-box.

I think I won in the ref­er­ence mate­r­ial sec­tion. Although I don’t think I am going to touch the wikipedia entry with a 10-foot-pole.

For some reason, I found myself reading the Duck Typing entry in wikipedia (which is sort of like watching a slow moving trainwreck). Of more interest was the Talk page. If you get a chance, I recommend you read both - and after your done laughing, take a look at my previous articles (rants?) on ...