<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OLPC: Shipping a Beta?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/</link>
	<description>python, programming and other things</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-62058</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/#comment-62058</guid>
		<description>Having participated and gotten a couple of these, from my playing and all my reading, its not as beta as you think, the hardware is pretty well debugged, the software on them on the other hand is beta (well something just short of a release candidate especially for the first world where we use encrypted routers, and expect basic debugging to have been done already,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having participated and gotten a couple of these, from my playing and all my reading, its not as beta as you think, the hardware is pretty well debugged, the software on them on the other hand is beta (well something just short of a release candidate especially for the first world where we use encrypted routers, and expect basic debugging to have been done already,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gjward</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-62057</link>
		<dc:creator>gjward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/#comment-62057</guid>
		<description>My wife took advantage of the "buy one get one" program, so I&#39;ve had a chance to use the OLPC.  I also think it&#39;s a bit "clunky."  My biggest complaint is the mouse pad.  As I slide my finger across the  pag, the corresponding movement of the mouse pointer is, at times, rather "herky jerky" (for lack of a better term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife took advantage of the &#8220;buy one get one&#8221; program, so I&#39;ve had a chance to use the OLPC.  I also think it&#39;s a bit &#8220;clunky.&#8221;  My biggest complaint is the mouse pad.  As I slide my finger across the  pag, the corresponding movement of the mouse pointer is, at times, rather &#8220;herky jerky&#8221; (for lack of a better term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredrik</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-62056</link>
		<dc:creator>fredrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/#comment-62056</guid>
		<description>I have not used the hardware (only played with the virtual machine). But I would be interested in how the XO hardware would work with a lightweight "old school" desktop environment such as XFCE. Looking at the specs it seems to be in the same league as my old Win98 laptop.&lt;br&gt;I found it puzzling that the XO virtual machine is much less responsive than a full blown Ubuntu VM. Maybe it&#39;s because it&#39;s emulating a whole lot more. But if that&#39;s not the case and it&#39;s a just a software (Sugar) problem OLPC would be in a much better position to turn things around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not used the hardware (only played with the virtual machine). But I would be interested in how the XO hardware would work with a lightweight &#8220;old school&#8221; desktop environment such as XFCE. Looking at the specs it seems to be in the same league as my old Win98 laptop.<br />I found it puzzling that the XO virtual machine is much less responsive than a full blown Ubuntu VM. Maybe it&#39;s because it&#39;s emulating a whole lot more. But if that&#39;s not the case and it&#39;s a just a software (Sugar) problem OLPC would be in a much better position to turn things around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Wheatley</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-62055</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Wheatley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 16:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/01/07/olpc-shipping-a-beta/#comment-62055</guid>
		<description>I&#39;m glad I&#39;m not the only one who was a little disappointed. I did participate in the G1G1 campaign, and haven&#39;t played with it much... mostly because I&#39;ve been too frustrated when I have played with it. My main goal was a usable (even if it was slow) browser on a tiny machine. This seems too lofty of a goal, since I can&#39;t even get the laptop connected to my wifi access point. My secondary goal was to spend a few spare cycles working on Python code for the project. I fear I will spend those extra cycles fighting the machine instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wish the project nothing but the best, and I hope they are successful in their attempts to educate the children of the world. However, as a busy father of one child, I feel my efforts are better spent elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m glad I&#39;m not the only one who was a little disappointed. I did participate in the G1G1 campaign, and haven&#39;t played with it much&#8230; mostly because I&#39;ve been too frustrated when I have played with it. My main goal was a usable (even if it was slow) browser on a tiny machine. This seems too lofty of a goal, since I can&#39;t even get the laptop connected to my wifi access point. My secondary goal was to spend a few spare cycles working on Python code for the project. I fear I will spend those extra cycles fighting the machine instead.</p>
<p>I wish the project nothing but the best, and I hope they are successful in their attempts to educate the children of the world. However, as a busy father of one child, I feel my efforts are better spent elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
