<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saturday @ Pycon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/</link>
	<description>python, programming and other things</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jnoller</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/comment-page-1/#comment-62132</link>
		<dc:creator>jnoller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/#comment-62132</guid>
		<description>With any luck, the free threading work will be incorporated into python core and enabled via a --with-freethreading flag. This means you would have 2 interpreters: A normal one, and the new one. The one catch would be that many C libraries would not work out of the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With any luck, the free threading work will be incorporated into python core and enabled via a &#8211;with-freethreading flag. This means you would have 2 interpreters: A normal one, and the new one. The one catch would be that many C libraries would not work out of the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Lisee</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/comment-page-1/#comment-62131</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Lisee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/2008/03/16/saturday-pycon/#comment-62131</guid>
		<description>Let me reinforce the opinion that its wrong to just outright dismiss the single process multiple threads area of concurrency.  My current project (&lt;a href="http://ram.umd.edu" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://ram.umd.edu&lt;/a&gt;) could use a lot more python code if I was able guarantee true concurrency.  So I am very excited to see that there are people working on a solution to the to GIL.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Has there been any words on whether "freethreading" will be incorporated into the Python core, or is it destined to become and alternate interpreter like stackless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me reinforce the opinion that its wrong to just outright dismiss the single process multiple threads area of concurrency.  My current project (<a href="http://ram.umd.edu" rel="nofollow">http://ram.umd.edu</a>) could use a lot more python code if I was able guarantee true concurrency.  So I am very excited to see that there are people working on a solution to the to GIL.  </p>
<p>Has there been any words on whether &#8220;freethreading&#8221; will be incorporated into the Python core, or is it destined to become and alternate interpreter like stackless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
