“Final” Draft of Processing inclusion PEP …

May 27th, 2008 § 9 comments

… Sent to peps@python.org — now more discussion/debate and stuff shall occur.

For your own edi­fi­ca­tion, here is what I just sent out. Spe­cial thanks to all of the early reviewers.

Edit: The PEP is on the offi­cial site: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0371/

  • http://www.goldb.org Corey Gold­berg

    I just read the PEP. nice work ;)

  • jnoller

    Thanks. I actu­ally scrapped the one I had writ­ten and re-wrote it from scratch last week. The first one wasn’t effi­cient enough

  • http://voodoowarez.com rek­tide

    open link in new win­dow makes baby jesus cry

  • PKKid

    I like it, ran some good tests. Look for­ward to see­ing this built in.

  • http://www.gamr7.com LBar­ret

    Excel­lent !

    I would be glad to see pypro­cess­ing enter the stan­dard lib.

    We use it and it is a great module.

    Also, a bit more expo­sure can­not hurt.

  • jnoller

    Yes, but most peo­ple have it open in a new tab.

  • jnoller

    Do you have any use cases or exam­ples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improve­ments you’d like to see to the mod­ule itself?

  • http://jessenoller.com jnoller

    Yes, but most peo­ple have it open in a new tab.

  • http://jessenoller.com jnoller

    Do you have any use cases or exam­ples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improve­ments you’d like to see to the mod­ule itself?

What's this?

You are currently reading “Final” Draft of Processing inclusion PEP … at jessenoller.com.

meta