Comments on: “Final” Draft of Processing inclusion PEP … http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/ python, programming and other things Sun, 04 Mar 2012 06:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: jnoller http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-139332 jnoller Thu, 29 May 2008 17:52:34 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-139332 Do you have any use cases or examples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improvements you'd like to see to the module itself? Do you have any use cases or examples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improvements you’d like to see to the module itself?

]]> By: jnoller http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-139331 jnoller Thu, 29 May 2008 17:51:50 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-139331 Yes, but most people have it open in a new tab. Yes, but most people have it open in a new tab.

]]> By: jnoller http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61978 jnoller Thu, 29 May 2008 13:52:34 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61978 Do you have any use cases or examples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improvements you'd like to see to the module itself? Do you have any use cases or examples you would like me to add to the PEP? Do you have any improvements you’d like to see to the module itself?

]]> By: jnoller http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61975 jnoller Thu, 29 May 2008 13:51:50 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61975 Yes, but most people have it open in a new tab. Yes, but most people have it open in a new tab.

]]> By: LBarret http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61977 LBarret Thu, 29 May 2008 09:05:01 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61977 Excellent ! <br><br>I would be glad to see pyprocessing enter the standard lib. <br><br>We use it and it is a great module. <br><br>Also, a bit more exposure cannot hurt. Excellent !

I would be glad to see pyprocessing enter the standard lib.

We use it and it is a great module.

Also, a bit more exposure cannot hurt.

]]> By: PKKid http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61976 PKKid Wed, 28 May 2008 22:56:10 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61976 I like it, ran some good tests. Look forward to seeing this built in. I like it, ran some good tests. Look forward to seeing this built in.

]]> By: rektide http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61974 rektide Wed, 28 May 2008 22:22:27 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61974 open link in new window makes baby jesus cry open link in new window makes baby jesus cry

]]> By: jnoller http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61973 jnoller Wed, 28 May 2008 20:27:02 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61973 Thanks. I actually scrapped the one I had written and re-wrote it from scratch last week. The first one wasn't efficient enough Thanks. I actually scrapped the one I had written and re-wrote it from scratch last week. The first one wasn’t efficient enough

]]> By: Corey Goldberg http://jessenoller.com/2008/05/27/final-draft-of-processing-inclusion-pep/comment-page-1/#comment-61972 Corey Goldberg Wed, 28 May 2008 20:08:29 +0000 http://jessenoller.com/?p=267#comment-61972 I just read the PEP. nice work ;) I just read the PEP. nice work ;)

]]>