<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python 3to2: Go check it out.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/</link>
	<description>python, programming and other things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:42:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: donspaulding</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-139113</link>
		<dc:creator>donspaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/?p=699#comment-139113</guid>
		<description>The py-postgresql project might be a good starting point for getting a realistic Python 3.X codebase backported via 3to2. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://python.projects.postgresql.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://python.projects.postgresql.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like 3to2 needs to learn how to remove annotations and dictionary comprehensions first.  Unfortunately hacking 3to2 is a bit beyond me.  Sounds like a great idea though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EDIT:  Actually, 3to2 does handle annotations correctly, it was just barfing on ParseErrors in certain files and then not running any fixers on those files.  Protip: READ THE OUTPUT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The py-postgresql project might be a good starting point for getting a realistic Python 3.X codebase backported via 3to2. </p>
<p><a href="http://python.projects.postgresql.org/" rel="nofollow">http://python.projects.postgresql.org/</a></p>
<p>It seems like 3to2 needs to learn how to remove annotations and dictionary comprehensions first.  Unfortunately hacking 3to2 is a bit beyond me.  Sounds like a great idea though.</p>
<p>EDIT:  Actually, 3to2 does handle annotations correctly, it was just barfing on ParseErrors in certain files and then not running any fixers on those files.  Protip: READ THE OUTPUT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donspaulding</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-118008</link>
		<dc:creator>donspaulding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/?p=699#comment-118008</guid>
		<description>The py-postgresql project might be a good starting point for getting a realistic Python 3.X codebase backported via 3to2. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://python.projects.postgresql.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://python.projects.postgresql.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It seems like 3to2 needs to learn how to remove annotations and dictionary comprehensions first.  Unfortunately hacking 3to2 is a bit beyond me.  Sounds like a great idea though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The py-postgresql project might be a good starting point for getting a realistic Python 3.X codebase backported via 3to2. </p>
<p><a href="http://python.projects.postgresql.org/" rel="nofollow">http://python.projects.postgresql.org/</a></p>
<p>It seems like 3to2 needs to learn how to remove annotations and dictionary comprehensions first.  Unfortunately hacking 3to2 is a bit beyond me.  Sounds like a great idea though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew cooke</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-114050</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew cooke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/?p=699#comment-114050</guid>
		<description>awesome indeed.  thanks for this.  saw an email ages ago to dev (which i don&#039;t read all of) suggesting this and then it seemed to disappear - gret to see it didn&#039;t get lost.   i will give it a go on lepl (see my link) next release (coming up soon).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome indeed.  thanks for this.  saw an email ages ago to dev (which i don&#39;t read all of) suggesting this and then it seemed to disappear &#8211; gret to see it didn&#39;t get lost.   i will give it a go on lepl (see my link) next release (coming up soon).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeamenta</title>
		<link>http://jessenoller.com/2009/08/27/python-3to2-go-check-it-out/comment-page-1/#comment-112272</link>
		<dc:creator>joeamenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jessenoller.com/?p=699#comment-112272</guid>
		<description>Haha, I would love to see what comes out of the 2to3 -&gt; 3to2 generator.  I had initially thought about making it a goal that 2to3 -&gt; 3to2 code would look the same as the original, but as I learned more, I conceded that it would be unrealistic and impractical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I would love to see what comes out of the 2to3 -&gt; 3to2 generator.  I had initially thought about making it a goal that 2to3 -&gt; 3to2 code would look the same as the original, but as I learned more, I conceded that it would be unrealistic and impractical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
