There is a Poll running on the front of the PyPI page — you have to log in to see it/vote. This poll is asking a question about the new feature(s) of allowing users to comment/5-star-rate a given package in the index.
Some of the Pros/Cons have already been added to the python wiki here, as well as this bug report here. The catalog-sig has some of the discussion as well.
This poll was created in part by this Python-Dev thread. I obviously make my opinion known.
Given my vehemence in the python-dev thread; I’d like to point out I am not against giving package consumers a voice — however, I do not think that as-implemented, these features serve anyone.
As developers of, moderators and community members on any number of social news and voting sites will point out to you — getting the system right takes a lot of time, and planning. Why not borrow pages from their play books?
You also can’t give the users a voice at the cost of the package maintainers — a balance has to be made. You have to protect and moderate out astroturfers, spammers, coordinated attacks against a given package, etc. It’s hard to get right, but easy to get wrong.
With regards to the rating system, Zed Shaw recently had an interesting piece on the bimodality of 1–5 rating systems. Comments on that here and here.
In any case; Martin put the poll up as he wants to get people’s opinions via the votes on this issue. Please take a moment to do so.
If you have suggestions on the actual implementation of a full-blown system for dealing with this, please drop an email to the catalog-sig mailing list.
-
jackdied
-
http://jessenoller.com jnoller
-
elpargo
-
http://lericson.blogg.se/code/ Ludvig Ericson
-
jackdied
-
http://jessenoller.com jnoller
-
elpargo
-
http://lericson.blogg.se/code/ Ludvig Ericson